Nick Ragone is an author, attorney and public relations executive in New York City. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history and political science from Rutgers University, and is a graduate of the Eagleton Institute of Political Science at Rutgers University (undergraduate) and the Georgetown University Law Center.

He is the author of three books: Essential American Government, Everything American Government, and President's Most Wanted. Nick is a regular contributor to the Fox News Channel and Fox Business, the PIX11 Morning Show, and has a weekly appearance on the popular Raph Bailey Radio Show.  He co-anchored PIX11's five-hour live inauguration coverage with Jim Watkins and Kaity Tong.

Nick is a contributor to Donklephant.com, one of the most influential political blogs on the web, and  has written for US News & World Report, The Star-Ledger, Real Simple Magazine and RealSimple.com.  Nick has been quoted in over two dozen stories on politics, the presidency, and public relations.  In December of 2007, Nick was named one of PR Week's 40 under 40 to watch, and in May of 2008 was featured in "Profiles of Success", a book about public relations. Nick lives in Jersey City, NJ, with his wife and two children, and spends what little free time he has obsessing on the Mets.

Nick can also be found on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=740817853




Powered by Squarespace

We are a member of...
Add to Technorati Favorites
BlogToplist.com  Politics Top Blogs

Blogcatalog.com Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

« Obama inches closer (while still managing to get blown out) | Main | Pennsylvania ... the new Florida »

Lingering bitterness

For anyone who believes that the Democrats will unite as soon as they have a nominee, the Washington Post has a must-read piece on the lingering bitterness between the two camps.

clintonobama_ap466.jpgIt's been known for quite some time now that a sizeable -- and growing -- percentage of the Democratic primary electorate will not vote for the "other" candidate:  Roughly a third of Hillary supporters have consistently said they would not vote for Obama, and a quarter of Obama voters feel likewise.

Conventional wisdom holds that the vast majority of these disgruntled voters will eventually make their way back to the nominee, but nothing has been conventional about this election so far.  It's gone on much longer, and been way nastier, than anyone could have predicted, and how it impacts the Democrat's ability to unite is a big X factor.

Given that McCain is saddled with a wildly unpopular President in a change election, the only chance he stands is if the bitterness lingers into the general election, and he takes advantage of it by appealing to Hillary's coalition of blue collar workers, economic populists, and church-goers (the Reagan Democrats).   McCain would be smart to tear a page from Hillary's playbook and stick to the issues they care about: economic security, values, and experience, and leave the foreign policy stuff on the sidelines.  It probably goes against his best instincts, but it could be a winning formula.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

While voting for a candidate based solely on party lines alone is generally a- for lack of a better word- stupid choice, for Democrats this seems to be the election in which such a decision would be beneficially impactful and even important.. as long as one doesn't compromise their beliefs too much, of course. It's incredibly divisive and mildly disheartening how many Democrats have said that they won't vote for the "other"... as this would obviously result in either more votes for McCain (simply because he's not the party's 'other') or no votes at all... neither of which is good. What a waste and a travesty that would be, totally defeating the purpose of everything the party has been fighting/hoping for... especially in/given the last 8 years. And I find it hard to truly believe that if someone lays out their political beliefs and aligns with either Obama or Clinton, that the next best thing for them is McCain, or that he's really so much better for them than the Democratic alternative. It's hypocritical and it's also a little scary to think (cynically or realistically, I don't know) of what possibly lies ahead if this were to unfold as it very well might... but before all hope's lost, there's still, well, hope. Don't create a divide where there needn't be one, people.

May 21, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterS.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>